| Title |
The case for reintroduction: The jaguar (Panthera onca) in the United States as a model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Science and Practice, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/csp2.392 |
| Authors |
Eric W. Sanderson, Jon P. Beckmann, Paul Beier, Bryan Bird, Juan Carlos Bravo, Kim Fisher, Melissa M. Grigione, Carlos A. López González, Jennifer R. B. Miller, Cristina Mormorunni, Laura Paulson, Rob Peters, John Polisar, Tony Povilitis, Michael J. Robinson, Sharon Wilcox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 30% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 48% |
| Scientists | 13 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1522. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,150
of 24,406,515 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#2
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344
of 431,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#2
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.