| Title |
Timing of chocolate intake affects hunger, substrate oxidation, and microbiota: A randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
FASEB Journal, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1096/fj.202002770rr |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teresa Hernández‐González, Rocío González‐Barrio, Carolina Escobar, Juan Antonio Madrid, Maria Jesús Periago, Maria Carmen Collado, Frank A. J. L. Scheer, Marta Garaulet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 281 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 61 | 22% |
| Spain | 19 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 3% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 133 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 216 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 13% |
| Scientists | 24 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2073. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,393
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from FASEB Journal
#1
of 11,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238
of 457,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FASEB Journal
#1
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.