↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Co‐infections and environmental conditions drive the distributions of blood parasites in wild birds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Ecology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
49 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Co‐infections and environmental conditions drive the distributions of blood parasites in wild birds
Published in
Journal of Animal Ecology, August 2016
DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.12578
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J. Clark, Konstans Wells, Dimitar Dimitrov, Sonya M. Clegg

Abstract

Experimental work increasingly suggests that non-random pathogen associations can affect the spread or severity of disease. Yet due to difficulties distinguishing and interpreting co-infections, evidence for the presence and directionality of pathogen co-occurrences in wildlife is rudimentary. We provide empirical evidence for pathogen co-occurrences by analysing infection matrices for avian malaria (Haemoproteus and Plasmodium spp.) and parasitic filarial nematodes (microfilariae) in wild birds (New Caledonian Zosterops spp.). Using visual and genus-specific molecular parasite screening, we identified high levels of co-infections that would have been missed using PCR alone. Avian malaria lineages were assigned to species level using morphological descriptions. We estimated parasite co-occurrence probabilities, while accounting for environmental predictors, in a hierarchical multivariate logistic regression. Co-infections occurred in 36% of infected birds. We identified both positively and negatively correlated parasite co-occurrence probabilities when accounting for host, habitat and island effects. Two of three pairwise avian malaria co-occurrences were strongly negative, despite each malaria parasite occurring across all islands and habitats. Birds with microfilariae had elevated heterophil to lymphocyte ratios and were all co-infected with avian malaria, consistent with evidence that host immune modulation by parasitic nematodes facilitates malaria co-infections. Importantly, co-occurrence patterns with microfilariae varied in direction among avian malaria species; two malaria parasites correlated positively but a third correlated negatively with microfilariae. We show that wildlife co-infections are frequent, possibly affecting infection rates through competition or facilitation. We argue that combining multiple diagnostic screening methods with multivariate logistic regression offers a platform to disentangle impacts of environmental factors and parasite co-occurrences on wildlife disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 21%
Researcher 41 17%
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 42 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 46%
Environmental Science 26 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 50 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#523,388
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Ecology
#139
of 3,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,346
of 346,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Ecology
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.