↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Report of AAPM Task Group 219 on independent calculation‐based dose/MU verification for IMRT

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Report of AAPM Task Group 219 on independent calculation‐based dose/MU verification for IMRT
Published in
Medical Physics, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/mp.15069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy C. Zhu, Sotiris Stathakis, Jennifer R. Clark, Wenzheng Feng, Dietmar Georg, Shannon M. Holmes, Stephen F. Kry, Chang‐Ming Charlie Ma, Moyed Miften, Dimitris Mihailidis, Jean M. Moran, Niko Papanikolaou, Bjorn Poppe, Ying Xiao

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Other 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 36 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 29 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 45 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,301,988
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#146
of 7,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,156
of 435,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#2
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.