| Title |
Report of AAPM Task Group 219 on independent calculation‐based dose/MU verification for IMRT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mp.15069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy C. Zhu, Sotiris Stathakis, Jennifer R. Clark, Wenzheng Feng, Dietmar Georg, Shannon M. Holmes, Stephen F. Kry, Chang‐Ming Charlie Ma, Moyed Miften, Dimitris Mihailidis, Jean M. Moran, Niko Papanikolaou, Bjorn Poppe, Ying Xiao |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,301,988
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#146
of 7,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,156
of 435,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#2
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.