↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 8,029)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance
Published in
Medical Physics, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/mp.14695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carri K. Glide‐Hurst, Eric S. Paulson, Kiaran McGee, Neelam Tyagi, Yanle Hu, James Balter, John Bayouth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 62 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 29 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 70 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,220,007
of 25,997,855 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#35
of 8,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,260
of 445,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#1
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,997,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,029 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.