↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

What is this page? Embed badge

Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results

Overview of attention for article published in Research Synthesis Methods, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results
Published in
Research Synthesis Methods, January 2022
DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1545
Pubmed ID
34970844
Authors

Shifeng Liu, Florence T. Bourgeois, Adam G. Dunn

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,114,199
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Research Synthesis Methods
#222
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,235
of 503,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Synthesis Methods
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Wiley Online Library.