↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results

Overview of attention for article published in Research Synthesis Methods, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
Title
Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results
Published in
Research Synthesis Methods, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1545
Authors

Shifeng Liu, Florence T. Bourgeois, Adam G. Dunn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,175,919
of 20,154,395 outputs
Outputs from Research Synthesis Methods
#160
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,429
of 331,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Synthesis Methods
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,154,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.