| Title |
Putting music to trial: Consensus on key methodological challenges investigating music‐based rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nyas.14892 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Grau‐Sánchez, Kevin Jamey, Evangelos Paraskevopoulos, Simone Dalla Bella, Christian Gold, Gottfried Schlaug, Sylvie Belleville, Antoni Rodríguez‐Fornells, Madeleine E. Hackney, Teppo Särkämö |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 36% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,652,971
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#1,457
of 12,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,485
of 440,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#12
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.