| Title |
The Chicxulub Impact Produced a Powerful Global Tsunami
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AGU Advances, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2021av000627 |
| Authors |
Molly M. Range, Brian K. Arbic, Brandon C. Johnson, Theodore C. Moore, Vasily Titov, Alistair J. Adcroft, Joseph K. Ansong, Christopher J. Hollis, Jeroen Ritsema, Christopher R. Scotese, He Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 912 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 114 | 13% |
| Mexico | 74 | 8% |
| Spain | 61 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 3% |
| Colombia | 23 | 3% |
| Canada | 14 | 2% |
| France | 14 | 2% |
| Chile | 12 | 1% |
| Japan | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 132 | 14% |
| Unknown | 433 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 786 | 86% |
| Scientists | 103 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1862. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,353
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from AGU Advances
#1
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184
of 441,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AGU Advances
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 108.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.