AAPM WGTG51 Report 374: Guidance for TG‐51 reference dosimetry
Medical Physics, September 2022
Bryan Muir, Wesley Culberson, Stephen Davis, Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim, Sung‐Woo Lee, Jessica Lowenstein, James Renaud, Arman Sarfehnia, Jeffrey Siebers, Laurent Tantôt, Naresh Tolani
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||63%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||7%|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||10||37%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||11%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
of 7,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 438,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.