↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Underestimated Passive Volcanic Sulfur Degassing Implies Overestimated Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
65 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Underestimated Passive Volcanic Sulfur Degassing Implies Overestimated Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, January 2023
DOI 10.1029/2022gl102061
Authors

U. A. Jongebloed, A. J. Schauer, J. Cole‐Dai, C. G. Larrick, R. Wood, T. P. Fischer, S. A. Carn, S. Salimi, S. R. Edouard, S. Zhai, L. Geng, B. Alexander

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#195,981
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#487
of 22,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,166
of 493,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#12
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.