↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor‐neutral reject analysis in radiography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor‐neutral reject analysis in radiography
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/acm2.13938
Authors

Kevin Little, Ingrid Reiser, Bruce Apgar, Poonam Dalal, Jaydev Dave, Ryan Fisher, Katie Hulme, Mary Ellen Jafari, Emily Marshall, Stephen Meyer, Quentin Moore, Nicole Murphy, Thomas Nishino, Katelyn Nye, Kevin O'Donnell, John Sabol, Adrian Sanchez, William Sensakovic, Lawrence Tarbox, Robert Uzenoff, Alisa Walz‐Flannigan, Charles Willis, Jie Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,506,679
of 23,755,107 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#290
of 1,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,469
of 394,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,755,107 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,944 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.