↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

A comparison of the climates of the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Little Ice Age, and Current Warm Period reconstructed using coral records from the northern South China Sea

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the climates of the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Little Ice Age, and Current Warm Period reconstructed using coral records from the northern South China Sea
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016jc012458
Authors

Wenfeng Deng, Xi Liu, Xuefei Chen, Gangjian Wei, Ti Zeng, Luhua Xie, Jian-xin Zhao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 46%
Environmental Science 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#801,318
of 18,321,436 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#87
of 3,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,156
of 396,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#4
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,321,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.