↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

A comparison of the climates of the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Little Ice Age, and Current Warm Period reconstructed using coral records from the northern South China Sea

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the climates of the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Little Ice Age, and Current Warm Period reconstructed using coral records from the northern South China Sea
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016jc012458
Authors

Wenfeng Deng, Xi Liu, Xuefei Chen, Gangjian Wei, Ti Zeng, Luhua Xie, Jian-xin Zhao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 42%
Environmental Science 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,043,495
of 21,555,788 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#114
of 4,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,064
of 418,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#6
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,555,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.