↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

A comparison of the climates of the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Little Ice Age, and Current Warm Period reconstructed using coral records from the northern South China Sea

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the climates of the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Little Ice Age, and Current Warm Period reconstructed using coral records from the northern South China Sea
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016jc012458
Authors

Wenfeng Deng, Xi Liu, Xuefei Chen, Gangjian Wei, Ti Zeng, Luhua Xie, Jian‐xin Zhao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 43%
Environmental Science 7 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,256,476
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#141
of 4,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,974
of 426,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#5
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.