| Title |
Resource selection and landscape change reveal mechanisms suppressing population recovery for the world's most endangered antelope
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12856 |
| Authors |
Abdullahi H. Ali, Adam T. Ford, Jeffrey S. Evans, David P. Mallon, Matthew M. Hayes, Juliet King, Rajan Amin, Jacob R. Goheen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#311,220
of 25,097,836 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#150
of 3,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,959
of 431,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,097,836 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.