The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/acm2.14160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert F. Krauss, Salim Balik, Eileen T. Cirino, Austin Hadley, Navneeth Hariharan, Shannon M. Holmes, Kayla Kielar, Hossein Lavvafi, Kiernan McCullough, Steven Palefsky, J. Phillip Sawyer, Koren Smith, Jason Tracy, Jeff D. Winter, Nicholai E. Wingreen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Peru | 1 | 9% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,305,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#89
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,415
of 354,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.