↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, October 2023
DOI 10.1002/acm2.14160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert F. Krauss, Salim Balik, Eileen T. Cirino, Austin Hadley, Navneeth Hariharan, Shannon M. Holmes, Kayla Kielar, Hossein Lavvafi, Kiernan McCullough, Steven Palefsky, J. Phillip Sawyer, Koren Smith, Jason Tracy, Jeff D. Winter, Nicholai E. Wingreen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Physics and Astronomy 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,305,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#89
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,415
of 354,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.