| Title |
The origin and speciation of orchids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.19580 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oscar A. Pérez‐Escobar, Diego Bogarín, Natalia A. S. Przelomska, James D. Ackerman, Juan A. Balbuena, Sidonie Bellot, Roland P. Bühlmann, Betsaida Cabrera, Jose Aguilar Cano, Martha Charitonidou, Guillaume Chomicki, Mark A. Clements, Phillip Cribb, Melania Fernández, Nicola S. Flanagan, Barbara Gravendeel, Eric Hágsater, John M. Halley, Ai‐Qun Hu, Carlos Jaramillo, Anna Victoria Mauad, Olivier Maurin, Robert Müntz, Ilia J. Leitch, Lan Li, Raquel Negrão, Lizbeth Oses, Charlotte Phillips, Milton Rincon, Gerardo A. Salazar, Lalita Simpson, Eric Smidt, Rodolfo Solano‐Gomez, Edicson Parra‐Sánchez, Raymond L. Tremblay, Cassio van den Berg, Boris Stefan Villanueva Tamayo, Alejandro Zuluaga, Alexandre R. Zuntini, Mark W. Chase, Michael F. Fay, Fabien L. Condamine, Felix Forest, Katharina Nargar, Susanne S. Renner, William J. Baker, Alexandre Antonelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 440 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 48 | 11% |
| United States | 32 | 7% |
| Japan | 15 | 3% |
| Brazil | 13 | 3% |
| Spain | 11 | 3% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| South Africa | 8 | 2% |
| Colombia | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 96 | 22% |
| Unknown | 190 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 311 | 71% |
| Scientists | 114 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 367. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#88,375
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#9
of 9,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,270
of 341,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#1
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.