↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Point‐of‐care Ultrasound for Nonangulated Distal Forearm Fractures in Children: Test Performance Characteristics and Patient‐centered Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Emergency Medicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
140 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Point‐of‐care Ultrasound for Nonangulated Distal Forearm Fractures in Children: Test Performance Characteristics and Patient‐centered Outcomes
Published in
Academic Emergency Medicine, April 2017
DOI 10.1111/acem.13146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naveen Poonai, Frank Myslik, Gary Joubert, Josiah Fan, Amita Misir, Victor Istasy, Melanie Columbus, Robert Soegtrop, Alex Goldfarb, Drew Thompson, Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky

Abstract

Distal forearm fractures are the most common fracture type in children. Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being used and preliminary studies suggest it offers an accurate approach to diagnosis. However, outcomes such as pain, satisfaction, and procedure duration have not been explored but may be salient to the widespread acceptance of this technology by caregivers and children. Our objectives were to examine the test performance characteristics of POCUS for non-angulated distal forearm injuries in children and compare POCUS to x-ray with respect to pain, caregiver satisfaction, and procedure duration. We conducted a cross-sectional study involving children aged 4-17 years with a suspected non-angulated distal forearm fracture. Participants underwent both x-ray and POCUS assessment. The primary outcome was sensitivity between POCUS and x-ray, the reference standard. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pain using the Faces Pain Scale - Revised, caregiver satisfaction using a five-item Likert scale, and procedure duration. POCUS was performed in 169 children of whom 76 were diagnosed with a fracture including 61 buckle fractures. Sensitivity of POCUS for distal forearm fractures was 94.7% [95% CI: 89.7, 99.8] and specificity was 93.5% [95% CI: 88.6, 98.5]. POCUS was associated with a significantly lower median (IQR) pain score compared to x-ray: 1 (0, 2) versus 2 (1, 3), respectively [median difference: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.5, 1; p<0.001] and no significant difference in median (IQR) caregiver satisfaction score: 5 (0) versus 5 (4, 5), respectively [median difference: 0, 95% CI: 0, 0, p=1.0]. POCUS was associated with a significantly lower median (IQR) procedure duration versus x-ray: 1.5 (0.8, 2.2) versus 27 (15, 58) minutes, respectively [median difference: 34.1; 95% CI: 26.8, 41.5, p<0.001]. Our findings suggest that POCUS assessment of distal forearm injuries in children is accurate, timely, and associated with low levels of pain and high caregiver satisfaction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2019.
All research outputs
#259,906
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Academic Emergency Medicine
#54
of 3,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,435
of 323,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Emergency Medicine
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.