↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: Longitudinal Models of Reciprocal Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Child Development, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
637 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
605 Mendeley
Title
Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: Longitudinal Models of Reciprocal Effects
Published in
Child Development, February 2017
DOI 10.1111/cdev.12704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reinhard Pekrun, Stephanie Lichtenfeld, Herbert W. Marsh, Kou Murayama, Thomas Goetz

Abstract

A reciprocal effects model linking emotion and achievement over time is proposed. The model was tested using five annual waves of the Project for the Analysis of Learning and Achievement in Mathematics (PALMA) longitudinal study, which investigated adolescents' development in mathematics (Grades 5-9; N = 3,425 German students; mean starting age = 11.7 years; representative sample). Structural equation modeling showed that positive emotions (enjoyment, pride) positively predicted subsequent achievement (math end-of-the-year grades and test scores), and that achievement positively predicted these emotions, controlling for students' gender, intelligence, and family socioeconomic status. Negative emotions (anger, anxiety, shame, boredom, hopelessness) negatively predicted achievement, and achievement negatively predicted these emotions. The findings were robust across waves, achievement indicators, and school tracks, highlighting the importance of emotions for students' achievement and of achievement for the development of emotions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 605 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 14%
Student > Master 76 13%
Student > Bachelor 62 10%
Researcher 43 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 7%
Other 85 14%
Unknown 212 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 161 27%
Social Sciences 75 12%
Mathematics 22 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 2%
Computer Science 12 2%
Other 87 14%
Unknown 236 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#250,818
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Child Development
#143
of 4,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,465
of 429,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Development
#9
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.