↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Retracted: Methane emissions from the Marcellus Shale in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia based on airborne measurements

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Retracted: Methane emissions from the Marcellus Shale in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia based on airborne measurements
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, April 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016jd026070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinrong Ren, Dolly L. Hall, Timothy Vinciguerra, Sarah E. Benish, Phillip R. Stratton, Doyeon Ahn, Jonathan R. Hansford, Mark D. Cohen, Sayantan Sahu, Hao He, Courtney Grimes, Ross J. Salawitch, Sheryl H. Ehrman, Russell R. Dickerson

Abstract

Natural gas production in the U.S. has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH4) leakage (total fugitive emissions), and climate impacts. Quantification of CH4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically sound, cost-effective policies for mitigating greenhouse gases. We use aircraft measurements and a mass balance approach for three flight experiments in August and September 2015 to estimate CH4 emissions from O&NG operations in the southwestern Marcellus Shale region. We estimate the mean ± 1σ CH4 emission rate as 36.7 ± 1.9 kg CH4 s(-1) (or 1.16 ± 0.06 Tg CH4 yr(-1)) with 59% coming from O&NG operations. We estimate the mean ± 1σ CH4 leak rate from O&NG operations as 3.9 ± 0.4% with a lower limit of 1.5% and an upper limit of 6.3%. This leak rate is broadly consistent with the results from several recent top-down studies but higher than the results from a few other observational studies as well as in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CH4 emission inventory. However, a substantial source of CH4 was found to contain little ethane (C2H6), possibly due to coalbed CH4 emitted either directly from coalmines or from wells drilled through coalbed layers. Although recent regulations requiring capture of gas from the completion venting step of the hydraulic fracturing appear to have reduced losses, our study suggests that for a 20 year time scale, energy derived from the combustion of natural gas extracted from this region will require further controls before it can exert a net climate benefit compared to coal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 28%
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 28%
Engineering 4 13%
Energy 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,264,012
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#329
of 5,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,798
of 324,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#6
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.