↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Conscious and unconscious processing of facial expressions: Evidence from two split-brain patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuropsychology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 270)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Conscious and unconscious processing of facial expressions: Evidence from two split-brain patients
Published in
Journal of Neuropsychology, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/jnp.12034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia Prete, Stefania D'Ascenzo, Bruno Laeng, Mara Fabri, Nicoletta Foschi, Luca Tommasi

Abstract

We investigated how the brain's hemispheres process explicit and implicit facial expressions in two 'split-brain' patients (one with a complete and one with a partial anterior resection). Photographs of faces expressing positive, negative or neutral emotions were shown either centrally or bilaterally. The task consisted in judging the friendliness of each person in the photographs. Half of the photograph stimuli were 'hybrid faces', that is an amalgamation of filtered images which contained emotional information only in the low range of spatial frequency, blended to a neutral expression of the same individual in the rest of the spatial frequencies. The other half of the images contained unfiltered faces. With the hybrid faces the patients and a matched control group were more influenced in their social judgements by the emotional expression of the face shown in the left visual field (LVF). When the expressions were shown explicitly, that is without filtering, the control group and the partially callosotomized patient based their judgement on the face shown in the LVF, whereas the complete split-brain patient based his ratings mainly on the face presented in the right visual field. We conclude that the processing of implicit emotions does not require the integrity of callosal fibres and can take place within subcortical routes lateralized in the right hemisphere.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 54%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,809,969
of 19,001,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuropsychology
#45
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,379
of 285,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuropsychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,001,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them