| Title |
The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Psychiatry, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wps.20472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Firth, John Torous, Jennifer Nicholas, Rebekah Carney, Abhishek Pratap, Simon Rosenbaum, Jerome Sarris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 219 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 37 | 17% |
| Australia | 19 | 9% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 73 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 138 | 63% |
| Scientists | 44 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,078 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1078 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 137 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 110 | 10% |
| Researcher | 103 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 64 | 6% |
| Other | 208 | 19% |
| Unknown | 328 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 274 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 55 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 4% |
| Other | 176 | 16% |
| Unknown | 375 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 761. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#26,159
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from World Psychiatry
#8
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#455
of 326,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Psychiatry
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.