The calibration and use of plane‐parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: An extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39
Medical Physics, June 1998
Peter R. Almond, Frank H. Attix, Leroy J. Humphries, Hideo Kubo, Ravinder Nath, Steve Goetsch, David W. O. Rogers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||12%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||5||12%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||25||60%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||10%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||5%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
of 7,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 35,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,889 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.