| Title |
Herbivores limit the population size of big‐leaf mahogany trees in an Amazonian forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oikos, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/oik.02324 |
| Authors |
Julian M. Norghauer, Christopher M. Free, R. Matthew Landis, James Grogan, Jay R. Malcolm, Sean C. Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 24% |
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,184,123
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Oikos
#2,501
of 3,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,781
of 269,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oikos
#38
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.