↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Degradation of Single‐Layer and Few‐Layer Graphene by Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 50,947)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
394 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Degradation of Single‐Layer and Few‐Layer Graphene by Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/anie.201806906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajendra Kurapati, Sourav P. Mukherjee, Cristina Martín, George Bepete, Ester Vázquez, Alain Pénicaud, Bengt Fadeel, Alberto Bianco

Abstract

Biodegradability of graphene is one of the fundamental parameters determining the fate in vivo of this material. Here, two types of aqueous dispersible graphene, corresponding to single layer (SLG) and few layer graphene (FLG), devoid of either chemical functionalisation or stabilizing surfactants, were subjected to biodegradation by human myeloperoxidase (hMPO) mediated catalysis. Graphene biodegradation was also studied in the presence of activated, degranulating human neutrophils. The degradation of both FLG and SLG sheets was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and electron microscopy analyses, leading to the conclusion that highly dispersed pristine graphene is not biopersistent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 394 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 18%
Chemistry 15 13%
Materials Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 386. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#81,758
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#11
of 50,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,608
of 343,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#2
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.