↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

An extracellular Leptospira interrogans leucine‐rich repeat protein binds human E‐ and VE‐cadherins

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular Microbiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
An extracellular Leptospira interrogans leucine‐rich repeat protein binds human E‐ and VE‐cadherins
Published in
Cellular Microbiology, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/cmi.12949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Azad Eshghi, Robert A. Gaultney, Patrick England, Sébastien Brûlé, Isabelle Miras, Hiromi Sato, Jenifer Coburn, Jacques Bellalou, Tara J. Moriarty, Ahmed Haouz, Mathieu Picardeau

Abstract

Pathogenic Leptospira bacteria are the causative agents of leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease affecting animals and humans worldwide. These pathogenic species have the ability to rapidly cross host tissue barriers by a yet unknown mechanism. A comparative analysis of pathogens and saprophytes revealed a higher abundance of genes encoding proteins with Leucine Rich Repeat (LRR) domains in the genomes of pathogens. In other bacterial pathogens, proteins with LRR domains have been shown to be involved in mediating host cell attachment and invasion. One protein from the pathogenic species L. interrogans, LIC10831, has been previously analyzed via X-ray crystallography, with findings suggesting it may be an important bacterial adhesin. Herein we show that LIC10831 elicits an antibody response in infected animals, is actively secreted by the bacterium, and binds human E-and VE-cadherins. These results provide biochemical and cellular evidence of LRR protein-mediated host-pathogen interactions and identify a new multi-receptor binding protein from this infectious Leptospira species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,047,669
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Cellular Microbiology
#979
of 1,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,094
of 341,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular Microbiology
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.