↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

What a Difference an OH Makes: Conformational Dynamics as the Basis for the Ligand Specificity of the Neomycin‐Sensing Riboswitch

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
What a Difference an OH Makes: Conformational Dynamics as the Basis for the Ligand Specificity of the Neomycin‐Sensing Riboswitch
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/anie.201507365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elke Duchardt‐Ferner, Sina R. Gottstein‐Schmidtke, Julia E. Weigand, Oliver Ohlenschläger, Jan‐Philip Wurm, Christian Hammann, Beatrix Suess, Jens Wöhnert

Abstract

To ensure appropriate metabolic regulation, riboswitches must discriminate efficiently between their target ligands and chemically similar molecules that are also present in the cell. A remarkable example of efficient ligand discrimination is a synthetic neomycin-sensing riboswitch. Paromomycin, which differs from neomycin only by the substitution of a single amino group with a hydroxy group, also binds but does not flip the riboswitch. Interestingly, the solution structures of the two riboswitch-ligand complexes are virtually identical. In this work, we demonstrate that the local loss of key intermolecular interactions at the substitution site is translated through a defined network of intramolecular interactions into global changes in RNA conformational dynamics. The remarkable specificity of this riboswitch is thus based on structural dynamics rather than static structural differences. In this respect, the neomycin riboswitch is a model for many of its natural counterparts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,351,840
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#39,150
of 50,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,507
of 395,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#443
of 693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.