↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Q‐space truncation and sampling in diffusion spectrum imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Q‐space truncation and sampling in diffusion spectrum imaging
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.1002/mrm.26071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiyuan Tian, Ariel Rokem, Rebecca D. Folkerth, Aapo Nummenmaa, Qiuyun Fan, Brian L. Edlow, Jennifer A. McNab

Abstract

To characterize the q-space truncation and sampling on the spin-displacement probability density function (PDF) in diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI). DSI data were acquired using the MGH-USC connectome scanner (Gmax  = 300 mT/m) with bmax  = 30,000 s/mm(2) , 17 × 17 × 17, 15 × 15 × 15 and 11 × 11 × 11 grids in ex vivo human brains and bmax  = 10,000 s/mm(2) , 11 × 11 × 11 grid in vivo. An additional in vivo scan using bmax =7,000 s/mm(2) , 11 × 11 × 11 grid was performed with a derated gradient strength of 40 mT/m. PDFs and orientation distribution functions (ODFs) were reconstructed with different q-space filtering and PDF integration lengths, and from down-sampled data by factors of two and three. Both ex vivo and in vivo data showed Gibbs ringing in PDFs, which becomes the main source of artifact in the subsequently reconstructed ODFs. For down-sampled data, PDFs interfere with the first replicas or their ringing, leading to obscured orientations in ODFs. The minimum required q-space sampling density corresponds to a field-of-view approximately equal to twice the mean displacement distance (MDD) of the tissue. The 11 × 11 × 11 grid is suitable for both ex vivo and in vivo DSI experiments. To minimize the effects of Gibbs ringing, ODFs should be reconstructed from unfiltered q-space data with the integration length over the PDF constrained to around the MDD. Magn Reson Med, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Neuroscience 6 15%
Engineering 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,832,901
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#5,273
of 6,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,937
of 395,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#43
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.