| Title |
Impacts of environmental filters on functional redundancy in riparian vegetation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12619 |
| Authors |
Daniel Bruno, Cayetano Gutiérrez‐Cánovas, David Sánchez‐Fernández, Josefa Velasco, Christer Nilsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 20% |
| Researcher | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#456,001
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#247
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,968
of 312,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.