↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM medical physics practice guideline 10.a.: Scope of practice for clinical medical physics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
AAPM medical physics practice guideline 10.a.: Scope of practice for clinical medical physics
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/acm2.12469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica B. Clements, Christopher T. Baird, Steven F. de Boer, Lynne A. Fairobent, Tyler Fisher, James H. Goodwin, Dustin A. Gress, Jennifer Lynn Johnson, Kathryn L. Kolsky, Gig S. Mageras, Rebecca M. Marsh, Melissa C. Martin, Brent Parker, Daniel C. Pavord, Michael C. Schell, J. Anthony Seibert, Donna M. Stevens, Russell B. Tarver, Christopher G. Waite-Jones, Nicholai Wingreen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Physics and Astronomy 10 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Linguistics 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,133,239
of 23,717,467 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#165
of 1,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,767
of 350,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,717,467 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,939 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.