Title |
Telomere dysfunction and chromothripsis
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Cancer, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/ijc.30033 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aurélie Ernst, David T.W. Jones, Kendra K. Maass, Agata Rode, Katharina I. Deeg, Billy Michael Chelliah Jebaraj, Andrey Korshunov, Volker Hovestadt, Michael A. Tainsky, Kristian W. Pajtler, Sebastian Bender, Sebastian Brabetz, Susanne Gröbner, Marcel Kool, Frauke Devens, Jennifer Edelmann, Cindy Zhang, Pedro Castelo-Branco, Uri Tabori, David Malkin, Karsten Rippe, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Stefan M. Pfister, Marc Zapatka, Peter Lichter |
Abstract |
Chromothripsis is a recently discovered form of genomic instability, characterized by tens to hundreds of clustered DNA rearrangements resulting from a single dramatic event. Telomere dysfunction has been suggested to play a role in the initiation of this phenomenon, which occurs in a large number of tumor entities. Here, we show that telomere attrition can indeed lead to catastrophic genomic events, and that telomere patterns differ between cells analyzed before and after such genomic catastrophes. Telomere length and telomere stabilization mechanisms diverge between samples with and without chromothripsis in a given tumor subtype. Longitudinal analyses of the evolution of chromothriptic patterns identify either stable patterns between matched primary and relapsed tumors, or loss of the chromothriptic clone in the relapsed specimen. The absence of additional chromothriptic events occurring between the initial tumor and the relapsed tumor sample points to telomere stabilization after the initial chromothriptic event which prevents further shattering of the genome. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Ireland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 23% |