The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Efficacy and safety of vitrectomy for congenital cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis based on randomized and controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Ophthalmologica (1755375X), November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1111/aos.13974 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kai Cao, Jinda Wang, Jingshang Zhang, Mayinuer Yusufu, Shanshan Jin, Simeng Hou, Guyu Zhu, Bingsong Wang, Ying Xiong, Jing Li, Xiaoxia Li, Lijing Chai, Hailong He, Xiu H. Wan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,486,051
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Acta Ophthalmologica (1755375X)
#134
of 2,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,237
of 449,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Ophthalmologica (1755375X)
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.