↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

High‐Parameter Mass Cytometry Evaluation of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Daratumumab Demonstrates Immune Modulation as a Novel Mechanism of Action

Overview of attention for article published in Cytometry Part A, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
High‐Parameter Mass Cytometry Evaluation of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Daratumumab Demonstrates Immune Modulation as a Novel Mechanism of Action
Published in
Cytometry Part A, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/cyto.a.23693
Pubmed ID
Authors

Homer C. Adams, Frederik Stevenaert, Jakub Krejcik, Koen Van der Borght, Tina Smets, Jaime Bald, Yann Abraham, Hugo Ceulemans, Christopher Chiu, Greet Vanhoof, Saad Z. Usmani, Torben Plesner, Sagar Lonial, Inger Nijhof, Henk M. Lokhorst, Tuna Mutis, Niels W.C.J. Donk, Amy Kate Sasser, Tineke Casneuf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,237,377
of 15,257,997 outputs
Outputs from Cytometry Part A
#605
of 1,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,377
of 382,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytometry Part A
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,257,997 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,010 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.