The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Cluster‐based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychophysiology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/psyp.13335 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jona Sassenhagen, Dejan Draschkow |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 12% |
| Germany | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 49% |
| Scientists | 37 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 513 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 142 | 28% |
| Researcher | 74 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 13% |
| Unknown | 89 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 142 | 28% |
| Psychology | 114 | 22% |
| Engineering | 23 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 21 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 11% |
| Unknown | 146 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#853,635
of 26,158,673 outputs
Outputs from Psychophysiology
#84
of 2,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,464
of 451,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychophysiology
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,158,673 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.