↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

3 patents


715 Dimensions

Readers on

633 Mendeley
Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101
Published in
Medical Physics, July 2010
DOI 10.1118/1.3438081
Pubmed ID

Stanley H. Benedict, Kamil M. Yenice, David Followill, James M. Galvin, William Hinson, Brian Kavanagh, Paul Keall, Michael Lovelock, Sanford Meeks, Lech Papiez, Thomas Purdie, Ramaswamy Sadagopan, Michael C. Schell, Bill Salter, David J. Schlesinger, Almon S. Shiu, Timothy Solberg, Danny Y. Song, Volker Stieber, Robert Timmerman, Wolfgang A. Tomé, Dirk Verellen, Lu Wang, Fang-Fang Yin


Task Group 101 of the AAPM has prepared this report for medical physicists, clinicians, and therapists in order to outline the best practice guidelines for the external-beam radiation therapy technique referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information is provided for establishing a SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures. Additionally, suggestions for developing consistent documentation for prescribing, reporting, and recording SBRT treatment delivery is provided.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 633 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 8 1%
Canada 5 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 599 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 121 19%
Other 104 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 15%
Student > Master 72 11%
Unspecified 52 8%
Other 188 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 246 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 226 36%
Unspecified 86 14%
Engineering 24 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 2%
Other 36 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
of 12,362,639 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
of 5,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 341,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,362,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.