The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1118/1.3438081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stanley H. Benedict, Kamil M. Yenice, David Followill, James M. Galvin, William Hinson, Brian Kavanagh, Paul Keall, Michael Lovelock, Sanford Meeks, Lech Papiez, Thomas Purdie, Ramaswamy Sadagopan, Michael C. Schell, Bill Salter, David J. Schlesinger, Almon S. Shiu, Timothy Solberg, Danny Y. Song, Volker Stieber, Robert Timmerman, Wolfgang A. Tomé, Dirk Verellen, Lu Wang, Fang‐Fang Yin |
| Abstract |
Task Group 101 of the AAPM has prepared this report for medical physicists, clinicians, and therapists in order to outline the best practice guidelines for the external-beam radiation therapy technique referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information is provided for establishing a SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures. Additionally, suggestions for developing consistent documentation for prescribing, reporting, and recording SBRT treatment delivery is provided. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1262 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 185 | 14% |
| Other | 166 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 130 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 79 | 6% |
| Other | 269 | 21% |
| Unknown | 318 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 391 | 30% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 341 | 26% |
| Engineering | 43 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 1% |
| Other | 69 | 5% |
| Unknown | 396 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,646,367
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#55
of 7,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,419
of 98,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,869 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.