↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Report of the AAPM TG‐256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Report of the AAPM TG‐256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy
Published in
Medical Physics, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/mp.13390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Paganetti, Eleanor Blakely, Alejandro Carabe‐Fernandez, David J. Carlson, Indra J. Das, Lei Dong, David Grosshans, Kathryn D. Held, Radhe Mohan, Vitali Moiseenko, Andrzej Niemierko, Robert D. Stewart, Henning Willers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 11 5%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 70 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 18%
Engineering 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 84 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,551,774
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#669
of 7,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,617
of 456,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#4
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.