↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy
Published in
Medical Physics, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/mp.13390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Paganetti, Eleanor Blakely, Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez, David J. Carlson, Indra J. Das, Lei Dong, David Grosshans, Kathryn D. Held, Radhe Mohan, Vitali Moiseenko, Andrzej Niemierko, Robert D. Stewart, Henning Willers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Master 13 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 44 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 25 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,852,597
of 15,549,387 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#424
of 6,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,950
of 268,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#8
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,549,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.