| Title |
Report of the AAPM TG‐256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mp.13390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harald Paganetti, Eleanor Blakely, Alejandro Carabe‐Fernandez, David J. Carlson, Indra J. Das, Lei Dong, David Grosshans, Kathryn D. Held, Radhe Mohan, Vitali Moiseenko, Andrzej Niemierko, Robert D. Stewart, Henning Willers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 230 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 69 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 18% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 86 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,551,774
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#669
of 7,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,617
of 456,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#4
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.