↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Mapping 3D fault geometry in earthquakes using high‐resolution topography: Examples from the 2010 El Mayor‐Cucapah (Mexico) and 2013 Balochistan (Pakistan) earthquakes

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mapping 3D fault geometry in earthquakes using high‐resolution topography: Examples from the 2010 El Mayor‐Cucapah (Mexico) and 2013 Balochistan (Pakistan) earthquakes
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016gl067899
Authors

Yu Zhou, Richard T. Walker, John R. Elliott, Barry Parsons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 30%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 78%
Unknown 6 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,988,119
of 12,819,611 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#3,999
of 12,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,717
of 265,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#112
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.