↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Over the top: do thermal barriers along elevation gradients limit biotic similarity?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
96 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Over the top: do thermal barriers along elevation gradients limit biotic similarity?
Published in
Ecography, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/ecog.01764
Authors

Juan Zuloaga, Jeremy T. Kerr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Unspecified 7 5%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 59%
Environmental Science 25 17%
Unspecified 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#795,312
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#185
of 2,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,162
of 304,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.