↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Over the top: do thermal barriers along elevation gradients limit biotic similarity?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,104)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
108 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Over the top: do thermal barriers along elevation gradients limit biotic similarity?
Published in
Ecography, March 2016
DOI 10.1111/ecog.01764
Authors

Zuloaga, Juan, Kerr, Jeremy T., Juan Zuloaga, Jeremy T. Kerr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 38%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 78%
Environmental Science 13 17%
Unspecified 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#162,676
of 8,871,848 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#36
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,472
of 283,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,871,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.