↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Over the top: do thermal barriers along elevation gradients limit biotic similarity?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,049)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
109 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Over the top: do thermal barriers along elevation gradients limit biotic similarity?
Published in
Ecography, March 2016
DOI 10.1111/ecog.01764
Authors

Zuloaga, Juan, Kerr, Jeremy T., Juan Zuloaga, Jeremy T. Kerr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 57 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 37%
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 82%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#138,473
of 8,396,916 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#28
of 1,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,994
of 282,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,396,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.