↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

The role of miRNAs in male human reproduction: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Andrology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
The role of miRNAs in male human reproduction: a systematic review
Published in
Andrology, October 2019
DOI 10.1111/andr.12714
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Salas‐Huetos, E. R. James, K. I. Aston, D. T. Carrell, T. G. Jenkins, M. Yeste

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,987,909
of 13,727,939 outputs
Outputs from Andrology
#128
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,373
of 211,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Andrology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,727,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.