↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Quality assurance for image‐guided radiation therapy utilizing CT‐based technologies: A report of the AAPM TG‐179

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
271 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
472 Mendeley
Title
Quality assurance for image‐guided radiation therapy utilizing CT‐based technologies: A report of the AAPM TG‐179
Published in
Medical Physics, March 2012
DOI 10.1118/1.3690466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean‐Pierre Bissonnette, Peter A. Balter, Lei Dong, Katja M. Langen, D. Michael Lovelock, Moyed Miften, Douglas J. Moseley, Jean Pouliot, Jan‐Jakob Sonke, Sua Yoo

Abstract

Commercial CT-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) systems allow widespread management of geometric variations in patient setup and internal organ motion. This document provides consensus recommendations for quality assurance protocols that ensure patient safety and patient treatment fidelity for such systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 454 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 84 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 13%
Student > Master 59 13%
Other 56 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 6%
Other 83 18%
Unknown 98 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 181 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 91 19%
Engineering 21 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 25 5%
Unknown 128 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,607,889
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#1,876
of 7,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,165
of 163,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#29
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.