| Title |
No consistent effects of humans on animal genetic diversity worldwide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.13394 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie L. Millette, Vincent Fugère, Chloé Debyser, Ariel Greiner, Frédéric J. J. Chain, Andrew Gonzalez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 16% |
| Canada | 7 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 56% |
| Scientists | 24 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#303,593
of 25,149,126 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#113
of 3,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,673
of 364,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,149,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.