↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

What is this page? Embed badge

AAPM Task Group 329: Reference dose specification for dose calculations: Dose‐to‐water or dose‐to‐muscle?

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
AAPM Task Group 329: Reference dose specification for dose calculations: Dose‐to‐water or dose‐to‐muscle?
Published in
Medical Physics, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/mp.13995
Pubmed ID
31883390
Authors

Stephen F. Kry, Vladimir Feygelman, Peter Balter, Tommy Knöös, C.‐M. Charlie Ma, Michael Snyder, Brian Tonner, Oleg N. Vassiliev

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Other 19 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 54 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Unspecified 6 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 29 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,484,430
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#178
of 7,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,749
of 452,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#9
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,792 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Wiley Online Library.