↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM Task Group 329: Reference dose specification for dose calculations: Dose‐to‐water or dose‐to‐muscle?

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
AAPM Task Group 329: Reference dose specification for dose calculations: Dose‐to‐water or dose‐to‐muscle?
Published in
Medical Physics, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/mp.13995
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen F. Kry, Vladimir Feygelman, Peter Balter, Tommy Knöös, C.‐M. Charlie Ma, Michael Snyder, Brian Tonner, Oleg N. Vassiliev

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 26%
Other 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 47 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 22 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,064,705
of 20,550,211 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#134
of 7,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,180
of 418,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#7
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,550,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.