| Title |
Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mp.14030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Ford, Leigh Conroy, Lei Dong, Luis Fong de Los Santos, Anne Greener, Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim, Jennifer Johnson, Perry Johnson, James G. Mechalakos, Brian Napolitano, Stephanie Parker, Deborah Schofield, Koren Smith, Ellen Yorke, Michelle Wells |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 39% |
| Spain | 8 | 14% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 49% |
| Scientists | 24 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 37 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#914,674
of 24,076,257 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#27
of 7,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,978
of 378,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#3
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,076,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,823 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.