↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 7,485)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275
Published in
Medical Physics, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/mp.14030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Ford, Leigh Conroy, Lei Dong, Luis Fong Los Santos, Anne Greener, Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim, Jennifer Johnson, Perry Johnson, James G. Mechalakos, Brian Napolitano, Stephanie Parker, Deborah Schofield, Koren Smith, Ellen Yorke, Michelle Wells

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Other 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 35 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 34 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#746,317
of 21,806,258 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#25
of 7,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,808
of 371,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#1
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,806,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.