↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 6,363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275
Published in
Medical Physics, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/mp.14030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Ford, Leigh Conroy, Lei Dong, Luis Fong Los Santos, Anne Greener, Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim, Jennifer Johnson, Perry Johnson, James G. Mechalakos, Brian Napolitano, Stephanie Parker, Deborah Schofield, Koren Smith, Ellen Yorke, Michelle Wells

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Other 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Mathematics 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#566,938
of 15,648,091 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#23
of 6,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,646
of 292,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#2
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,648,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.