| Title |
Dealing with Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A New Frontier for Conservation Planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12260 |
| Authors |
Amy L. Whitehead, Heini Kujala, Brendan A. Wintle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 74% |
| Scientists | 10 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 67 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#827,767
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#288
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,888
of 371,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.