↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
121 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries
Published in
Conservation Letters, February 2020
DOI 10.1111/conl.12708
Authors

Francesco Ferretti, David M. P. Jacoby, Mariah O. Pfleger, Timothy D. White, Felix Dent, Fiorenza Micheli, Andrew A. Rosenberg, Larry B. Crowder, Barbara A. Block

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 11 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 55 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 20%
Environmental Science 23 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 57 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#356,747
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#128
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,960
of 458,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.