↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
119 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries
Published in
Conservation Letters, February 2020
DOI 10.1111/conl.12708
Authors

Francesco Ferretti, David M. P. Jacoby, Mariah O. Pfleger, Timothy D. White, Felix Dent, Fiorenza Micheli, Andrew A. Rosenberg, Larry B. Crowder, Barbara A. Block

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Master 11 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 52 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Environmental Science 22 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 54 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#343,388
of 22,562,129 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#128
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,203
of 380,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,562,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.