| Title |
Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12708 |
| Authors |
Francesco Ferretti, David M. P. Jacoby, Mariah O. Pfleger, Timothy D. White, Felix Dent, Fiorenza Micheli, Andrew A. Rosenberg, Larry B. Crowder, Barbara A. Block |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 17% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 62% |
| Scientists | 41 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#353,072
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#116
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,422
of 466,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.