↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
116 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries
Published in
Conservation Letters, February 2020
DOI 10.1111/conl.12708
Authors

Francesco Ferretti, David M. P. Jacoby, Mariah O. Pfleger, Timothy D. White, Felix Dent, Fiorenza Micheli, Andrew A. Rosenberg, Larry B. Crowder, Barbara A. Block

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Master 13 8%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 77 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 20%
Environmental Science 25 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 79 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#397,587
of 26,225,548 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#125
of 1,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,650
of 485,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,225,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.