| Title |
FRST: A national soil testing database to improve fertility recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agricultural & Environmental Letters, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ael2.20008 |
| Authors |
Sarah E. Lyons, Deanna L. Osmond, Nathan A. Slaton, John T. Spargo, Peter J. A. Kleinman, Dan K. Arthur, Joshua M. McGrath |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 69% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 31% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,319,908
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural & Environmental Letters
#57
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,533
of 398,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural & Environmental Letters
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.