↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Dose‐rate considerations for the INTRABEAM electronic brachytherapy system: Report from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group no. 292

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Dose‐rate considerations for the INTRABEAM electronic brachytherapy system: Report from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group no. 292
Published in
Medical Physics, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/mp.14163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wesley S. Culberson, Stephen D. Davis, Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim, Jessica R. Lowenstein, Zoubir Ouhib, Marija Popovic, Timothy J. Waldron, Habib Safigholi, Samantha J. Simiele, Mark J. Rivard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Other 6 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,879,369
of 17,397,008 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#5,312
of 6,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,491
of 279,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#118
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,397,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.