| Title |
Dose‐rate considerations for the INTRABEAM electronic brachytherapy system: Report from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group no. 292
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mp.14163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wesley S. Culberson, Stephen D. Davis, Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim, Jessica R. Lowenstein, Zoubir Ouhib, Marija Popovic, Timothy J. Waldron, Habib Safigholi, Samantha J. Simiele, Mark J. Rivard |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#18,718,509
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#6,176
of 7,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,360
of 385,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#93
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.