| Title |
Landscape simplification shapes pathogen prevalence in plant‐pollinator networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.13521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura L. Figueroa, Heather Grab, Wee Hao Ng, Christopher R. Myers, Peter Graystock, Quinn S. McFrederick, Scott H. McArt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 10% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Malta | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 57% |
| Scientists | 36 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 25% |
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#335,278
of 25,349,102 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#136
of 3,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,944
of 382,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.