| Title |
Effects of amusing memes on concern for unappealing species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Lenda, Pjoter Skórka, Błażej Mazur, William Sutherland, Piotr Tryjanowski, Dawid Moroń, Erik Meijaard, Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 532 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 117 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 60 | 11% |
| Canada | 22 | 4% |
| Spain | 13 | 2% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| India | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Philippines | 6 | 1% |
| Poland | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 68 | 13% |
| Unknown | 214 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 326 | 61% |
| Scientists | 179 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 390. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#79,870
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#15
of 4,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,953
of 434,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.