↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Effects of amusing memes on concern for unappealing species

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 3,167)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
624 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Effects of amusing memes on concern for unappealing species
Published in
Conservation Biology, June 2020
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Lenda, Pjoter Skórka, Błażej Mazur, William Sutherland, Piotr Tryjanowski, Dawid Moroń, Erik Meijaard, Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 624 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 57%
Environmental Science 6 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 386. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#39,201
of 16,267,112 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#8
of 3,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,952
of 277,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,267,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.