↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
267 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
581 Mendeley
Title
Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66
Published in
Medical Physics, September 2003
DOI 10.1118/1.1609271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sasa Mutic, Jatinder R. Palta, Elizabeth K. Butker, Indra J. Das, M. Saiful Huq, Leh-Nien Dick Loo, Bill J. Salter, Cynthia H. McCollough, Jacob Van Dyk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 581 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 8 1%
Spain 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 550 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 89 15%
Researcher 80 14%
Student > Master 80 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 13%
Student > Bachelor 39 7%
Other 111 19%
Unknown 104 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 236 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 122 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 5%
Engineering 29 5%
Computer Science 5 <1%
Other 29 5%
Unknown 131 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,803,842
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#760
of 7,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,842
of 51,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.