The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
High‐frequency (20 MHz) high‐intensity focused ultrasound: New Treatment of actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, and Kaposi sarcoma. An open‐label exploratory study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Skin Research & Technology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1111/srt.12883 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jørgen Serup, Torsten Bove, Tomasz Zawada, Alexander Jessen, Mattia Poli |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 24% |
Engineering | 4 | 16% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Energy | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#495,785
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Skin Research & Technology
#13
of 762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,280
of 436,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skin Research & Technology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.