↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Practical application of AAPM Report 270 in display quality assurance: A report of Task Group 270

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Practical application of AAPM Report 270 in display quality assurance: A report of Task Group 270
Published in
Medical Physics, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/mp.14227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas B. Bevins, Michael S. Silosky, Aldo Badano, Rebecca M. Marsh, Michael J. Flynn, Alisa I. Walz‐Flannigan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Other 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#10,235,437
of 16,048,876 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#4,315
of 6,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,324
of 298,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#65
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,048,876 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.